Skip to main content

Player/ deck rating

Comments

2 comments

  • Shane Pickles

    I disagree, I am not interested in comparisons. I play for fun not competition.

    0
  • Mintimperial69
    Hi Shane, so my thought behind this is more of a tool with which to ensure you get games that are fun, think of it as a way of setting an ELO rating that ensure you get fun/challenging games, some players are skilled, some players have strong decks and one or two rare ones like cobblestonemdm and fireant that have both. I feel to balance this you need to have an objective rating of a deck and a skill factor. Vainglory has a good example of this. Now this was submitted in V1 of PVP -when it was hard to get matches, and the game has progressed somewhat since then, so this metric could well be hidden(I'd like to see it, but then I'm a complexity hound) but you could allow players to set a challenge slider based on how overmatched they might be comfortable with. Personally the interesting/ enjoyable games to me are the ones I lose or come close to losing, but for new players to stick with it, and to make this product viable there needs to be a proper nursery slope. What's your in game nick? Maybe we have had some interesting games?
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Powered by Zendesk